PERBANDINGAN DAYA DUKUNG PONDASI AKIBAT PERBEDAAN METODE KONSTRUKSI PONDASI DALAM
Budijanto Widjaja
Program Studi Teknik Sipil, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan
Sri Ratna Wahyuningsih
Program Studi Teknik Sipil, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan
Abstract
This research uses 4 types of piles as the objects, a bored pile, a continuous flight auger (CFA) pile, a full displacement pile (FDP), and a full displacement pile with an expander body, the depth for all piles is 9.5 m. The bored pile, CFA, FDP, and FPD with expander body have the following diameter: 62 cm, 45 cm, 45 cm, and 22 cm. Each pile, which has different construction method, is tested by full-scale static loading, excluding the FDP with expander body, it uses Osterberg-Cell. The research aims to know which analysis method best suits a particular kind of foundation and to compare each pile capacity. The pile capacity analysis conventionally using t-z and q-z curve gives 13%-15% higher estimation than the static loading test result. Analysis using Plaxis for FDP with expander body gives lower estimation than the Osterberg Cell test result.
Keywords:Continuous flight auger, full displacement pile, t-z curve, q-z curve
WIDJAJA, Budijanto; WAHYUNINGSIH, Sri Ratna.
PERBANDINGAN DAYA DUKUNG PONDASI AKIBAT PERBEDAAN METODE KONSTRUKSI PONDASI DALAM.
JURNAL SPEKTRAN, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 2, july 2017.
ISSN 2809-7718.
Available at: <http://103.29.196.112/index.php/jsn/article/view/32942>. Date accessed: 04 mar. 2026.